Search for: "Richardson v. Ramirez" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2010, 2:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, other than felon disenfranchisement laws, which are grounded in § 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Richardson v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Richardson, Seventh Circuit: The Court reversed the denial of habeas relief and remanded for further proceedings because the state court applied a rule of law contrary to controlling precedent of the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Wil-Rich, 588 N.W.2d 688, 696 (Iowa 1999); Ramirez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 8:40 pm by Franita Tolson
Ramirez, which I rely on for support of this point.  In Richardson, the Supreme Court held that section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment was not violated when states disenfranchised felons because of section 2’s language that states were not subject to the penalty of reduced representation when they abridge the right to vote for participating “rebellion, or other crime.”  In other words, the Court used section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment in order to interpret… [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Ramirez, Justice William Rehnquist said that Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment – which was arguably intended to protect the voting rights of freed slaves by sanctioning states that disenfranchised them – exempts disenfranchisement based on a felony conviction. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am by Steven F. Huefner
With respect to vote deprivation claims, in one early case (Richardson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by Richard Hunt
June 17, 2019) is so similar to Johnson v Ramirez that there is no point in providing details. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am by David Post
" This position is based on a rather egregious mis-reading of the leading Supreme Court case on the matter, Richardson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 3:33 pm by Nicole Muller
However, under the authority of the Fourteenth Amendment and Richardson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
• Thomas Flynn, 49, of Richardson, died July 17, 2020. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]