Search for: "Richardson v. Ramirez" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2008, 4:10 pm
Bourne has posted Richardson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 2:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, other than felon disenfranchisement laws, which are grounded in § 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Richardson v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Richardson, Seventh Circuit: The Court reversed the denial of habeas relief and remanded for further proceedings because the state court applied a rule of law contrary to controlling precedent of the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
Ramirez (2004) -- sufficiency of non-particularized search warrant Grutter v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Wil-Rich, 588 N.W.2d 688, 696 (Iowa 1999); Ramirez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 7:00 pm by Rick Hasen
It is not clear to me why the same approach cannot be taken with section 2, which has languished in obscurity with the exception of one case, Richardson v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Ramirez, Justice William Rehnquist said that Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment – which was arguably intended to protect the voting rights of freed slaves by sanctioning states that disenfranchised them – exempts disenfranchisement based on a felony conviction. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 8:40 pm by Franita Tolson
Ramirez, which I rely on for support of this point.  In Richardson, the Supreme Court held that section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment was not violated when states disenfranchised felons because of section 2’s language that states were not subject to the penalty of reduced representation when they abridge the right to vote for participating “rebellion, or other crime.”  In other words, the Court used section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment in order to interpret… [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am by Steven F. Huefner
With respect to vote deprivation claims, in one early case (Richardson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by Richard Hunt
June 17, 2019) is so similar to Johnson v Ramirez that there is no point in providing details. [read post]