Search for: "Richardson v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 590
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
Several officers, including some mounted units, attempted to quell the crowd. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:55 pm by Melissa L. Greipp
  In the article, Justice Ginsburg describes her first oral argument before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm by Larry
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And yet I took the job.And swore the oath set forth in 28 USC § 453.Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the… [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
Several officers, including some mounted units, attempted to quell the crowd. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, and Morris v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
19 May 2014, 8:43 pm
    Procedural HistoryThis appeal arises out of an interference proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) relating to drug treatments for spinal nerve injuries. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
LaserCase number: 09-cv-09144 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2009Qualifying judgment/order: February 12, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-30 SEC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:35 am by David Lat
[ATL Redline] * As I predicted, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:22 am
” Yet standing doctrine recognizes that sometimes constitutional issues will escape judicial review, at least in the short term – see United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
But the Court has already given up on the desire to maintain public-private parallelism: in the § 1983 context, Richardson v. [read post]