Search for: "Richardson v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
Originally, maritime or admiralty law was applicable when any claim arose upon the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 11:26 am by Angela Mauroni
The case challenges the proclamation Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States from Executive Order 13780. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
Cox:As provided by Title 28, Section 508(B) of the United States Code and Title 28, Section 0.132(A) of the Code of Federal Regulations, I have today assumed the duties of Acting Attorney General.In that capacity I am, as instructed by the President, discharging you, effective a [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:45 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:24 am by Mark S. Humphreys
On November 29, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in the case styled, Bruce Leipzig, M.D. v Principle Life Insurance Company. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 1:03 am
OHA case now pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm by Andy Sellars
The case went up to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which issued what is still the best opinion in favor of these constitutional arguments, Glik v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 1:05 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California might rule anytime now. [read post]