Search for: "Rick Garnett" Results 81 - 100 of 248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2007, 11:34 am
Recently, Rick Garnett posted about a conversation he has every year with his neighbor that got me thinking about how others perceive what we do. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 6:44 am by Walter Olson
Rick Garnett, Notre Dame Law School; and Goodwin Procter LLP partner Thomas Hefferon, discussing Murr v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:34 am by Steve Shiffrin
Over at Mirror of Justice, Rick Garnett maintains that liberal Catholics have no good reason to be discouraged in their Church. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:16 pm
  I'll start: I would be interested in hearing more about Rick Garnett's post on the costs and benefits of changing casebooks. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Shiffrin
I just returned from the Annual Law and Religion Roundtable held at the Northwestern Law School and organized by Nelson Tebbe, Paul Horwitz, Rick Garnett and hosted by Andy Koppelman (who presented chapters from an excellent forthcoming book of his). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 7:46 am
Rick writes:[A Chill wind from Rome] is what a number of bloggers and commentators perceive in the partial-birth-abortion decision. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:58 pm by Paul Horwitz
Our lunch talk was given by our own Prawfsblawger Rick Garnett, who spoke on freedom of religion and the nondiscrimination norm. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
I’ll be moderating a panel on “Property, Religious and Secular” with Roger Pilon and Rick Garnett, and other well-known Cato names appear through the day. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 8:34 am by Howard Wasserman
Rick Garnett writes at Mirror of Justice that this week marks 15 years of his blogging there (and slightly less time blogging here). [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:11 am by BDG
Rick Garnett suggested recently in this space that it is “obvious” (Rick’s word) that legal entities have Free Exercise rights, and Will Baude has written a bit more cautiously that churches “or the real parties in interest behind them” probably can assert their own first amendment claims. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 3:26 pm
Over there, Rick Garnett recently linked to a column by Spengler in the AsiaTimes. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:08 pm by Chris Lund
Rick Garnett below notes the Court’s decision this morning in Arizona Christian Tuition Organization v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
 As seems common with this fine event, the proceedings include some fantastic short articles by terrific scholars, including especially good pieces by Doug Laycock, Henry Smith, and our own Rick Garnett -- and the paper I discuss below, by our own Rick Hills. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:04 pm
  But I think Rick Garnett spots the real issue: What would this willingness [of prisoners to pay for a safer jail term] tell us about the extent to which we are failing in (what I take to be) our obligation to protect those we incarcerate? [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:53 am by Jay Wexler
I'd like to second Rick Garnett's endorsement of Daniel Okrent's book on Prohibition called Last Call. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 12:09 pm by Robert Hockett
Rick Garnett and Robby George at Mirror have posted a link to a letter that they have composed which explains why. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:47 pm by Steve Shiffrin
My recent post, “How the Religious Right Promotes Abortion,” elicited a quick response from Michael New of the Witherspoon Institute, which was just as quickly endorsed by Rick Garnett and Thomas Peters. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:43 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
I decided to post this short reading list after seeing the following parenthetical remark at Mirror of Justice by Rick Garnett (and not only because it is one of the few occasions we see things eye-to-eye): “I’ll confess to considerable skepticism about whether we really learn much about ‘virtue,’ as I understand it, from research with hard-core ‘mind-is-brain’ reductionist premises. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:17 am by Michael Perry
Now, in response to Rick Garnett, some hasty thoughts: Rob raised some questions—important questions, in my view--about the argument, and then concluded with this: “Does SSM represent changes to marriage beyond the gender of the participants, and if it does, are the changes likely to impede the essential social functions of marriage? [read post]