Search for: "Rick Hills" Results 181 - 200 of 748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2017, 1:00 pm by Elie Mystal
Instead they'll probably run a Goldman executive with an innovative plan to retrain bigoted hill people for the hi-tech jobs of the future. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Walter Olson at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, Another new case for next term involves the whistleblower provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial law. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills maintains that “[c]ases like Murr merely ratify what we already really know: When it comes to property in land, the states are inevitably in charge, and it is there that we libertarians ought to direct our energies. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:29 pm by Ilya Somin
Rick Hills and I have been debating the value of judicial protection for property rights for a long time now. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the Ecuador decision comes from Devin Henry at The Hill. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen notes that yesterday the court without comment denied a motion to have the mandate issued immediately in North Carolina v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that “the balancing test that the Court puts forward for when a special election should be held makes great sense, and will extend beyond the racial gerrymandering cases. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Zach Abels
” Compared to McMaster, Petraeus, and Mattis, however—all of whose counterinsurgency exploits have been vividly documented by West, Tom Ricks, Fred Kaplan, George Packer and, most recently, Dexter Filkins—Kershaw flew under the radar. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:22 am by Rick Garnett
As I mentioned, responding to Rick Hills, in the comments to Howard's post (!) [read post]
24 May 2017, 7:20 am by Richard Pildes
Rick Hills, a colleague, has a provocative essay at prawfsblawg, on the post-2010 racial redistricting cases, including Monday’s decision in the North Carolina case. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen suggests that the ruling may indicate that “the Court has really no appetite to get back into this area right now—perhaps they want to save their capital in ruling on other high profile cases coming down the line. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:18 am by Jim Sedor
Rick Quinn is the fourth South Carolina legislator charged as part of a corrupt [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
’” Additional coverage comes from Pete Williams at NBC News, the Associated Press, Adam Liptak and Michael Wines in The New York Times, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Ariane de Vogue and Daniella Diaz at CNN, Vann R. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:03 am by David Fontana
The dialogue was rich and substantial, and some good posts to consult as part of that discussion were those by Rick Hills here, Heather Gerken here, and Ilya Somin here. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:26 pm by Andrew Hamm
Commentary on the future of the court comes from Rick Hasen for Los Angeles Times, who suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts may become the court’s new swing vote, and Matt Ford for The Atlantic. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:17 pm by Andrew Hamm
Additional early commentary comes from Ross Barkan for The Guardian, Jonathan Adler for The Volokh Conspiracy at The Washington Post, Rick Hasen for his Election Law Blog, Ilya Shapiro and Roger Pilon for Cato at Liberty, Ramesh Ponnuru for National Review, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern for Slate, Kent Scheidegger for his Crime and Consequences blog, Ian Millhiser with two posts for Think Progress, Andrew Prokop for Vox, Charles Pierce for Esquire, Ivan Eland for The… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons discusses the court’s decision earlier this term in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on the case comes from Tim Lynch in an op-ed at The Hill, in which he urges the court to “reject the government’s argument that there doesn’t have to be a trial because everyone already knows what the outcome would be,” and argues that “there’s nothing wrong with jury nullification. [read post]