Search for: "Rick Pildes" Results 1 - 20 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2011, 9:26 am by Jack Goldsmith
Rick Pildes has a very thoughtful post at Balkinization on the constitutional politics of the War Powers Resolution, the difficulties Congress faces in responsibly controlling executive discretion to make war, how Chadha enhances these difficulties, and what to do about it all.  [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:45 am by Kenneth Anderson
Lawfare readers might be interested to follow a Volokh Conspiracy online debate between Lawfare senior contributor/NYU professor Rick Pildes and Volokh blogger/Georgetown professor Nick Rosenkranz on whether a treaty can increase the legislative power of Congress. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 7:00 am by Paul Caron
Rick Pildes (NYU) presented Political Fragmentation in Democracies of the West at Virginia yesterday as part of its Oxford-Virginia Legal Dialogs hosted by Tsilly Dagan and Ruth Mason: The decline of effective government throughout most Western democracies poses one of the greatest challenges democracy currently confronts. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:51 pm
I spoke this afternoon with Professor Rick Pildes (NYU) about Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:07 am
Over at Balkinization, leading election law scholar Rick Pildes has posted a response to my argument that campaign finance laws are likely to be incumbent-protection laws. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:26 pm
"Disagreeing With Rick Hasen on the North Carolina Case": Richard Pildes has this post at the "Election Law Blog. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Bob Bauer
My colleague Rick Pildes has made a thoughtful, well-crafted case for the constitutionality of a judicially enforceable codification of the DOJ special counsel regulations. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:49 am
I recently read and enjoyed Rick Pildes’s article in the Supreme Court Review: Institutional Formalism and Realism in Constitutional and Public Law. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:25 pm
"In the View of the Supreme Court, Alan Dershowitz is Wrong About the Powers of the President": Rick Pildes has this post at "Lawfare. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:16 pm by Howard Bashman
“How FDR’s Court-Packing Plan Set Progressive Policies Back by 25 Years”: Rick Pildes has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:05 am
NYU law professor Rick Pildes has a lengthy post on Balkinization previewing Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 4:06 am
Election law scholar Rick Pildes has two excellent posts explaining why the "Millionaires Amendment," which the Supreme Court struck down on Thursday was probably enacted by Congress for the purpose of... [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm by Howard Bashman
“Clarifying the Electoral Count Act Process”: The “Election Law Blog” has posted this statement from law professors Richard Pildes, Edward Foley, Rick Hasen, Lisa Manheim, and Nate Persily. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 4:24 am by Steve Shiffrin
Rick Pildes has an essay (here) which he discusses at Balkinization. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:54 am by Joe Patrice
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Charles Grassley, Chuck Grassley, Jack Lew, John Sexton, Laura Cunningham, Law School Deans, Law Schools, Money, Noel Cunningham, NYU Law School, Pam Martens, Politics, Real Estate, Richard Pildes, Richard Revesz, Rick Pildes, Senator Charles E. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:30 am by JB
Irvine), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Frank Pasquale (Maryland), Rick Pildes (NYU), John McGinnis (Northwestern), and myself.At the conclusion, Neal and Larry will respond to the commentators. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:08 am by Rick Hills
I know that my post's title has a "dog-bites-man" blandness, but, in the context of our hyper-ventilated politics, it is downright weird to come across an analysis of the investigation and trial of suspected terrorists as calmly nuanced as today's post by Rick Pildes and David Golove over at Baliknization. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:45 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Rick’s opening remarks begin around 31 minutes in.   [read post]