Search for: "Rick Pildes"
Results 181 - 200
of 255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
References: Accounting Board Challenged in Court by Fawn John Johnson and Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal False claims by Government to Supreme Court: PCAOB agency more powerful and independent than alleged by Hans Bader The Structure of Government and Today's Argument in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Case by Rick Pildes in Balkinization Considerations of PCAOB Posted by David Zaring in The Conglomerate Sarbanes-Oxley and its devilish details by Lyle Denniston in the SCOTUS… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
In another post at the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes looks ahead to next month’s oral argument in Evenwel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Unfortunately, this hasn't happened and according to Rick Hasen's recent article "The Untimely Death of Bush v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
” Rick Pildes has aptly described this provision as a loaded weapon, lying around for an unscrupulous state legislature to invoke. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes predicts that, if the Court strikes down the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:42 am
Update: Also at Lawfare, Rick Pildes argues that government silence undermines terrorism policies – an observation that I agree with, and which I make in similar terms at Lawfare as part of a comment on the possible operational role of the CIA in Afghanistan once US combat forces are formally gone. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Looking further forward, Balkinization's Rick Pildes previews Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:22 pm
In a recent post at the Election Law blog, prominent election law and constitutional law scholars Ned Foley, Michael McConnell, Derek Muller, Rick Pildes, and Brad Smith, summarize the bill's strengths and urge Congress to swiftly pass it: Here are the main features of the draft, which are a vast improvement on the existing Act from 1887. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:31 am
" The "logic" of our political order and the "separation of parties, not powers" (as Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson our it, is that an opposition party has no reason whatsoever to cooperate (or, in their language, "collaborate," with a president of the opposite party, for the simple reason that president's will pick up (at least) 90% of the credit for any accomplishments. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
Like Rick Pildes (himself borrowing from earlier political scientists), Aldrich also emphasizes the collapse of the schizoid Democratic Party following the Voting Rights Act of 1965, when the “big tent” of Northern liberals and Southern white racists disappeared, with many of the latter, of course, migrating to the Republican Party in the aftermath of Barry Goldwater’s vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and, more importantly, Richard… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 4:26 am
And Rick Pildes considered whether Congress could simply codify the DOJ special counsel regulations. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Rick Pildes considered whether Congress could simply codify the DOJ Special Counsel regulations. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:46 am
Rick Pildes outlined the options for congressional lawmakers who want to protect the Mueller investigation by law. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
Gerken contrasts her “internalist” account of Windsor with “psychoanalytic” ones offered by scholars such as Rick Pildes, Michael Klarman, Mary Dudziak, and myself. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:27 am
Update: Rick Pildes from NYU has alerted me to his excellent post, found here on Balkinization, also arguing for a codification of the Miranda public safety exception in terrorist situations. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:56 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes pushes back against the electors’ argument that chaos might also result from a ruling for the states, explaining why “[t]he Court should feel free to resolve the cases without any concern that permitting states to bind their electors creates any meaningful risk, even if we ever face, for the first time, a situation in which a winning candidate dies in the 5-6 weeks between the election and the meeting of the Electoral… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
At Balkinization, Rick Pildes praises the ruling as a positive outcome from the Court’s “first foray into the way changing technologies, the internet in particular, should affect the potential conflicts between democracy, the First Amendment, political participation, and privacy,” while Ruthann Robson offers an interpretation of the ruling’s implications at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Josh Blackman notes that the opinion reaffirms the importance of the… [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
[ADDENDUM: I should have been clearer in my original post that the "institutional warfare" is a function of what Rick Pildes and Darryl Levinson have called the "separation of parties" more than the "separation of powers" per se. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes observes that “[d]eciding to hear the Maryland case is a significant signal that a majority of the Court is not going to hold partisan gerrymandering claims to be non-justiciable (that is, inappropriate for judicial resolution)” in the first partisan-gerrymandering case this term, Gill v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
” But as Rick Pildes says in Charlie’s story, it’s not likely in any event that courts are going to weigh in on the matter (As Jack points out below, the Kucinich suit is a non-starter). [read post]
