Search for: "Rick Pildes" Results 41 - 60 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2017, 3:27 am by Alex Potcovaru
Bob Bauer responded with some doubt to Rick Pildes’ August 3 argument that a judicially enforceable codification of regulations on the DOJ special counsel would be constitutional. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:58 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Bob Bauer replied to Rick Pildes’ August 3 argument that a judicially enforceable codification of regulations on the DOJ special counsel would be constitutional. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Bob Bauer
My colleague Rick Pildes has made a thoughtful, well-crafted case for the constitutionality of a judicially enforceable codification of the DOJ special counsel regulations. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am by Michel Paradis
” Later, Rick Pildes offered a more favorable view of these legislative efforts as mere codifications of safeguards that the Department of Justice had already put in place via regulation. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 4:26 am by Alex Potcovaru
And Rick Pildes considered whether Congress could simply codify the DOJ special counsel regulations. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Rick Pildes considered whether Congress could simply codify the DOJ Special Counsel regulations. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 10:55 am by JB
Rick Pildes and Darryl Levinson have pointed out that our system is better described as separation of parties rather than separation of powers. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Rick Pildes took issue with Alan Dershowitz’s recent argument that the President has complete control over all federal law-enforcement investigations, even those that impact himself and those around him. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:25 pm
"In the View of the Supreme Court, Alan Dershowitz is Wrong About the Powers of the President": Rick Pildes has this post at "Lawfare. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
” Ruthann Robson analyzes the opinion at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and at the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes and Justin Levitt do the same here and here, respectively. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:26 pm
"Disagreeing With Rick Hasen on the North Carolina Case": Richard Pildes has this post at the "Election Law Blog. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Amy Howe (description of the case) Rick Pildes Ezra Rosenberg and Kristen Clarke (and more coming)   … Continue reading → [read post]
22 May 2017, 11:44 am by Justin Levitt
Rick Hasen and Rick Pildes have already weighed in on the NC redistricting case this morning. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes looks at the issues at stake in the court’s second major racial redistricting case this term, Cooper v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 6:59 am by Rick Hasen
The cert petition (signed by Bob Bauer, Rick Pildes, John … Continue reading → [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:26 pm by Andrew Hamm
Commentary on the future of the court comes from Rick Hasen for Los Angeles Times, who suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts may become the court’s new swing vote, and Matt Ford for The Atlantic. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 7:27 am by Rick Hasen
Important Rick Pildes at WaPo’s The Monkey Cage: The Supreme Court confirmation wars will become less heated only if the stakes in individual appointments diminish. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Molly Runkle
Cox for Medium, Brady Zadrozny for The Daily Beast, Rick Pildes for Balkinization, Corey Brettschneider for The New York Times, Paul Kane for The Washington Post, Paul Callan of CNN,  Emily Crockett of Vox, as well as Sean Illing, Steven Ertelt of LifeNews, and Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:00 pm by Will Baude
One of my favorite law review articles in recent years is Rick Pildes’s “Institutional Formalism and Realism in Constitutional and Public Law,” published in the Supreme Court Review in 2014. [read post]