Search for: "Rick Pildes"
Results 61 - 80
of 254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 9:08 am
Tom Edsall gave Rick Pildes the last word–actually the last several paragraphs–in his latest column. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:56 am
As Rick Pildes observed a few days ago, Alaska’s at-large House seat may show the significance of using different versions of ranked-choice voting. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:33 pm
Rick Pildes has written more on Caperton, framed as a response to Linda Greenhouse. [read post]
28 May 2008, 4:51 am
In addition to this insightful post from Rick Pildes, coverage of yesterday's Section 5 decision in Riley v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 12:37 pm
I appreciate the posts from Professor Rick Pildes and Professor Michael Herz on the nature of “Congress” under the Elections Clause, but I take a different approach. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 3:26 pm
Some early news reports: AP Bloomberg Reuters Legal Times (Tony Mauro/Law.com) Blogospheric reaction: Rick Pildes Marty Lederman Richard Briffault Bob Bauer Interest group reaction: Gerry Hebert, Campaign Legal Center Democracy 21 My initial reactions are here. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:47 am
NY Times (and this editorial) Washington Post Wall Street Journal (and see this editorial LA Times National Law Journal USA Today Dahlia Lithwick (Slate) Guy Charles (responding to Rick Pildes) BNA ($) My thoughts on the case are here.... [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 9:39 am
Rick Pildes here at ELB has already commented on the petitioners’ brief in Moore v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 8:05 am
Like Larry Diamond, Rick Pildes, and me (just to list a few), Elving specifically cites the new Alaska system as worthy… Continue reading [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 11:58 am
This is a guest post from Professor Michael Herz: In a recent Election Law Blog post regarding the Independent State Legislature doctrine, Rick Pildes observes that the term “Congress” in the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:33 am
Abby Thernstrom, Pam Karlan, and Rick Pildes wrote about the case at an online forum at the NY Times. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:30 pm
Rick Pildes more sensibly says... [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 10:49 am
SALPAL: Join us virtually for a conversation with Professors Rick Pildes and Carolyn Shapiro and attorney Jason Torchinsky on September 29th at 4 p.m. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:54 am
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Charles Grassley, Chuck Grassley, Jack Lew, John Sexton, Laura Cunningham, Law School Deans, Law Schools, Money, Noel Cunningham, NYU Law School, Pam Martens, Politics, Real Estate, Richard Pildes, Richard Revesz, Rick Pildes, Senator Charles E. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 2:30 pm
Rick Pildes has just put up a terrific guest post on this blog about the John Edwards case–Rick’s even more skeptical than I am about the prosecution’s case. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm
Rick Pildes, with a new piece on elections exceptionalism. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Rick Pildes (NYU) appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
8 May 2014, 3:00 am
A few measured, non-alarmist reactions to the decision: Noah Feldman via Rick Pildes, ABC News (quoted views of Rick Garnett, Notre Dame, and Daniel Mach, ACLU), and Howard Wasserman/Prawfs. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:28 am
Speakers will include Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyoming), Jess Bravin, Charles Lane, Rick Pildes, and Nina Totenberg. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:39 am
Rick Pildes wrote this piece for Slate on how plaintiffs may harness new redistricting technology to bring more successful Section 2 claims after Milligan: This new technology makes it possible to find VRA districts that might have been hard to… Continue reading The post “The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Decision Is Even Better Than It Looks” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]