Search for: "Rick Pildes" Results 101 - 120 of 246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 7:40 pm by Kali Borkoski
New 10:40 Justin Levitt, Ilya Shapiro, Rick Hasen, Ellen Katz, Jeffrey Harris and  Richard Pildes have posted commentary as part of our online symposium about the decision. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm by Joey Fishkin
On the face of it, what the Court did today in Shelby County seems more modest than what it might have done. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:02 pm by Marty Lederman
On the other hand, as Rick Pildes has encouraged me to stress, there is certainly rhetoric in the majority opinion that reads the Elections Clause very broadly–indeed, in some respects, it is the high-water mark of the Court’s case law respecting that clause, hardly limited to the narrowest reading of the clause’s terms:  “The Clause’s substantive scope is broad,” writes Justice Scalia. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:54 am by Joe Patrice
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Charles Grassley, Chuck Grassley, Jack Lew, John Sexton, Laura Cunningham, Law School Deans, Law Schools, Money, Noel Cunningham, NYU Law School, Pam Martens, Politics, Real Estate, Richard Pildes, Richard Revesz, Rick Pildes, Senator Charles E. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:04 am
 As Daryl Levinson and Rick Pildes argued in a 2006 article, during periods of divided government, separation of powers may be even stronger than the framers anticipated: Although there is less loyalty to institutions, party loyalty ensures that if either the House or the Senate is in the hands of the party that does not hold the White House, we can expect vigorous inter-branch competition. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:30 pm by Ross Davies
Meyer Debate on the Treaty Power, The Volokh Conspiracy, Jan. 13-Feb. 3, 2013, by Nick Rosenkranz, Eugene Kontorovich, Rick Pildes & Ilya Somin The Decision to Uphold the Mandate as Tax Represents a Gestalt Shift in Constitutional Law, Legal Theory Blog, June 28, 2012, by Lawrence Solum Asian-Americans, Affirmative Action, and Fisher v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 2:28 pm by Heather K. Gerken
Some, like Rick Pildes, think we should move to a system of universal voter protection. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm by Curtis Bradley
  As a result, I have followed with great interest an ongoing debate about this issue, on The Volokh Conspiracy, between Rick Pildes and Nick Rosenkranz, with interventions by Ilya Somin and Eugene Kontorovich. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:45 am by Kenneth Anderson
Lawfare readers might be interested to follow a Volokh Conspiracy online debate between Lawfare senior contributor/NYU professor Rick Pildes and Volokh blogger/Georgetown professor Nick Rosenkranz on whether a treaty can increase the legislative power of Congress. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:50 pm by Robert Chesney
  If you are going to be there, put the following on your calendar:  Friday January 4 2:00-5:00 Presidential Program, “Assessing the Future of International Criminal Justice: from Nuremberg to the ICC” (Rosedown, 3rd Floor, Hilton) Saturday January 5  7:00-8:30 Section on Constitutional Law – Breakfast session on presidential power in the Bush and Obama administration, featuring Professors Michael McConnell and Rick Pildes (Grand Salon 3&6,… [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 12:48 pm by Ritika Singh
He references Rick Pildes’s article with Samuel Issacharoff, both of NYU Law, entitled “Targeted Warfare.” [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 12:48 pm by Ritika Singh
He references Rick Pildes’s article with Samuel Issacharoff, both of NYU Law, entitled “Targeted Warfare.” [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:33 am by Rick Hasen
Rick Pildes has written this piece for The Atlantic. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm by Sandy Levinson
  But as Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson accurate have pointed out, it's "separation of parties," not of powers, that define our system in most important respects. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:21 pm by Nathaniel Persily
And as Rick Pildes notes in his post, the geographic congruence of racial polarization and Section 5 coverage will certainly not be perfect, so even by that arguably irrelevant metric advocates would need to return to the larger questions as to how close the fit with Section 5 coverage needs to be.) [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by Richard Hasen
The story of the 2006 Amendments’ passage is fascinating and well told by Nate Persily and Rick Pildes. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
We are grateful to the following contributors who will weigh in next week on the cases currently in the pipeline and how the Court should or will rule on the challenges to the VRA: Guy-Uriel Charles  – Duke Law Adam Cox – NYU School of Law and Thomas Miles – University of Chicago Law School Luis Fuentes-Rohwer – Indiana Maurer School of Law Richard Hasen – UC Irvine School of Law and Election Law Blog Heather Gerken – Yale Law School Nathaniel Persily – Columbia Law School… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:37 am by Sandy Levinson
Madison was right in Federalist 51; it's simply, as Daryl (no relation) Levinson and Balkinization contributor Rick Pildes pointed out several years ago, that "ambition," in the modern American political system, is linked almost infinitely less to institutional loyalties than to partisan ones. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:45 am by Dan Tokaji
Reaction from ATP, Cato, Huffpost, Jennifer Rubin, and Justice at Stake, in addition to the posts below from Rick Hasen and Rick Pildes. [read post]