Search for: "Ricks v State" Results 41 - 60 of 1,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2016, 12:41 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court heard oral argument in McDonnell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:54 pm
Taking a relatively boring issue, Maj Rick Belliss did his best to spice it up. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:44 pm by Howard Bashman
Gore Concurrence and the Independent State Legislature Theory in 2004 Salazar Case; The Issue Was Clear to Justice Stevens’ Then-Clerk (and Now-CA Supreme Court Justice) Leondra Kruger”: Rick Hasen has this post at his “Election Law Blog. [read post]
30 May 2013, 3:35 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Scott regarding the Executive Order of controversial Florida Governor Rick Scott requiring drug testing of all prospective state employees and random testing of all state employees. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:08 am
Rick Kittel and KU Defender Project student Danny Moskowitz won in State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
 That's just a tentative thought, however.What I find more interesting is the dog that doesn't bark in Rick's article, despite his extensive discussion of cases like Atkins v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:08 pm by Chris Lund
Rick Garnett below notes the Court’s decision this morning in Arizona Christian Tuition Organization v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:57 pm by Kevin
After a series of "twists and turns" that began Tuesday afternoon, the judge declared a mistrial Wednesday in Calcagno v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:59 am
Rick Hills has this very interesting post on Riley v. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 2:30 pm
Governor Matt Blunt yesterday signed legislation repealing the state's contribution limits, which were enacted by Missouri voters in 1994 and upheld in Nixon v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Walter Olson
By 4-3 margin Connecticut Supreme Court finds state's constitution guarantees all children "suitable" education, finance decrees to follow [CLT] Welcome Mark Steyn readers (he linked to Rick Esenberg's post on health care and the constitution); Comer v. [read post]