Search for: "Rider v. Rider" Results 261 - 280 of 1,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 12:20 am by John Diekman
In any event, the Appellate Division determined that plaintiff's arguments do not present triable issues of fact that would warrant the denial of the defendant's motion.Case:  DeJesus v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:25 am by John Diekman
The risk of a horse acting in an unintended manner resulting in the rider being thrown is a risk inherent in the sport of horseback riding, and there is no evidence that defendant stable was reckless. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 5:13 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: 7 reasons to avoid amusement parks this summer, August 1, 2015, Market Watch More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:24 pm by Kaitlyn Walsh
"When you're a pilot, you understand why moths fly into candles," says Rodney V. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:02 pm by Parker Rider-Longmaid
Parker Rider-Longmaid clerked for Ginsburg during the 2016-17 term. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:09 am by David Doniger
The goal of the funding riders is to overrule the Supreme Court’s landmark 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
A copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Hersch v DeWitt Stern Group, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This reasoning would apply to Title VII retaliation claims as well.The case is Wrobel v. [read post]