Search for: "Rider v. Rider" Results 321 - 340 of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by Steve Davies
”  “If I were not constrained by which I believe is binding precedent from the Ninth Circuit, and on-point precedent from other circuits, I would hold Section 1713 [Tester’s rider] is unconstitutional because it violates the Separation of Powers doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  An interesting case involving assumption of risk and injuries sustained by a road cyclist was decided on May 19th by the Second Department  - Cotty v Town of Southampton, 2009 NY Slip Op 04020.The plaintiff was a member of a bicycle club which engaged in long-distance rides. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am by Unknown
Title V of Division AA of the FY23 appropriations bill would provide for a registration exemption for small business mergers and acquisitions brokers by amending Exchange Act Section 15(b) to add a new subsection (13). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
Lady Justice ArdenAs Lady Justice Arden pointed out in her leading judgment, Gallarotti v Sebastianelli [2012] EWCA Civ 865 did not require the Court of Appeal to decide any new law: "Nonetheless, this appeal may be of wide interest as the factual paradigm is not uncommon. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:53 pm
" While most businesses operating in Florida owe their customers such a duty, the ruling of the state District Court of Appeal for the First District in Hinley v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:01 am by Steve Davies
’s ESA claims over the delisting were unripe, and (2) ruled against the plaintiffs on their NEPA claims (Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 3:41 pm
The following articles are included in the latest issue of Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology: From Free Riders to Fairness: A Cooperative System for Organ Transplantation, by Christopher Tarver Robertson; Why a Conviction Should Not Be Based on a Single Piece of Evidence: A Proposal for Reform, by Boaz Sangero and Mordechai Halpert; Developments in Science and Technology Law, part II: Labcorp v. [read post]