Search for: "Rider v. Rider" Results 321 - 340 of 1,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2010, 11:38 am by Norman Gregory Fernandez
There are many Veteran Motorcycle Clubs in the area, Vietnam Vets, Legacy Vets, Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), American Legion Riders, Brotherhood of Marine Corps Riders, Leathernecks, Rough Riders, and many more. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am by Unknown
Title V of Division AA of the FY23 appropriations bill would provide for a registration exemption for small business mergers and acquisitions brokers by amending Exchange Act Section 15(b) to add a new subsection (13). [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  An interesting case involving assumption of risk and injuries sustained by a road cyclist was decided on May 19th by the Second Department  - Cotty v Town of Southampton, 2009 NY Slip Op 04020.The plaintiff was a member of a bicycle club which engaged in long-distance rides. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  An interesting case involving assumption of risk and injuries sustained by a road cyclist was decided on May 19th by the Second Department  - Cotty v Town of Southampton, 2009 NY Slip Op 04020.The plaintiff was a member of a bicycle club which engaged in long-distance rides. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by Steve Davies
”  “If I were not constrained by which I believe is binding precedent from the Ninth Circuit, and on-point precedent from other circuits, I would hold Section 1713 [Tester’s rider] is unconstitutional because it violates the Separation of Powers doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  An interesting case involving assumption of risk and injuries sustained by a road cyclist was decided on May 19th by the Second Department  - Cotty v Town of Southampton, 2009 NY Slip Op 04020.The plaintiff was a member of a bicycle club which engaged in long-distance rides. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
Lady Justice ArdenAs Lady Justice Arden pointed out in her leading judgment, Gallarotti v Sebastianelli [2012] EWCA Civ 865 did not require the Court of Appeal to decide any new law: "Nonetheless, this appeal may be of wide interest as the factual paradigm is not uncommon. [read post]