Search for: "Rider v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:30 pm
Her father, Samuel William Weiss (b. 1852) was the son of William Weiss (b. 1819), who had been born in Austria in 1819, emigrated to the United States in 1848, and become a grocer in a small town in northeastern Pennsylvania. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:11 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 10:50 am
However, in Diamond v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 1:09 pm
So this joins my previous contributions to Wikipedia correcting articles such as those on the Idaho official state song, United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:56 am
United States, involved the conflict between state abortion bans and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), a federal law that requires life- and health-saving care, including abortion, in emergency departments. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
(Attorney General Wirt for instance, opined in 1827 that the President could order the discontinuance of a “vexatio[us]” suit in the name of the United States if it was “wholly unfounded in law. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 9:49 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 10:39 am
Lien v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
That rule, which was scheduled to take effect on September 4, 2024, would have broadly banned virtually all noncompete clauses between employers and workers in the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
That rule, which was scheduled to take effect on September 4, 2024, would have broadly banned virtually all noncompete clauses between employers and workers in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Jefferson Powell has written, however, Marshall's approach has always been "the constitutional mainstream" in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:27 pm
In Barlow v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
The Supreme Court considered a number of decisions by the ECtHR, including Unite the Union v United Kingdom [2017] IRLR 438, in which it was held that member states have a wide margin of discretion in how they protect trade union freedom. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s imprimatur in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
" Excerpt:The "free lunch" refers to the once-common tradition of saloons in the United States providing a "free" lunch to patrons who had purchased at least one drink. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
