Search for: "Rider v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am by Kia Rahnama
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
It doesn't appear the Iowa State Patrol investigated this fatality. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
 A majority of the Justices joined in the critique, most strongly expressed in 2014 in Harris v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 12:27 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
” The insurance carrier was home based in another state and the policy was made available to large companies throughout the United States who used independent drivers like our client, through a trust company based in Washington, DC. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Power of Public Labor Unions In California, as in many other states, a public sector bargaining unit may, by majority vote, elect to create an “agency shop” in which the union is the collective bargaining agent on behalf of all the employees. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
Nakanishi, john a. powell, Maria Blanco, Howard Winant Indigenous Peoples: Response to the Periodic Report of the United States to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Tribal Self-Government in the United States John Dossett When Affirmative Action Was White Ira Katznelson The Importance of Targeted Universalism john a. powell, Stephen Menendian & Jason Reece Implicit Bias A Forum – eds. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:32 pm by Clerquette LeClerq
Collins, for example, describes one of her first oral arguments, in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am by Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad
Attorney’s Office in D.C on May 24th, it was revealed that the individuals in question were charged with “conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States” and causing injury to museum property in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Sections 6303(b)(2): Touching of, or Injuries to, Property. [read post]