Search for: "Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2008, 6:04 am
The blogosphere has already beaten Riegel v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:10 pm
§ 360k pursuant to Riegel v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:41 am
Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:50 pm
Medtronic, Inc., SUCV2009-05286-A, slip op. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 5:50 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 2016 U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:57 am
Riegel's family sued the catheter's manufacturer, Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:53 pm
Medtronic Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:16 pm
Medtronic Inc. (676 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2012)) left plaintiffs who sue the manufacturers of pre-market approved devices precious little in the way of potential state-law claims that are not expressly preempted by Riegel or impliedly preempted by Buckman. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
Riegel v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:36 am
Riegel SG/FDA Merits br. at 6, 11 ("FDA's premarket approval gives specific content to those general requirements as applied to a particular device"), 24 (requirements "include the specific design and labeling requirements imposed as part of the PMA process").PMA is in no way comparable to the less rigorous form of marketing clearance at issue in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:37 pm
We wish.Our side lost that issue in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
Medtronic, Inc., 921 F. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), where he held that most tort claims against PMA devices are expressly preempted by a federal statute. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:28 am
Medtronic, Inc., No. 08-CV-6062, slip op. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:09 pm
PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 7:33 am
If passed, it would overturn the Supreme Court decision, Riegel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:02 am
Medtronic, Inc., No. 10-17755, slip op. [read post]
