Search for: "Riley v. Kennedy"
Results 81 - 100
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Riley challenged this action as racially discriminatory under Batson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
(in support of petitioner) Amicus brief of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation (in support of petitioner) Amicus brief of the United States (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-77 Case name: Riley v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:33 pm
Brady, in Gideon, or striking down Plessy v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 2:28 am
"
State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The other curveball thrown by Justice Kennedy was in Gonzalez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:09 pm
Riley On March 25, 2013, Magistrate Judge Steven C. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 10:46 am
By James V. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:23 pm
Justice Roberts noted that the Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
Wurie (with Riley v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:13 am
” At the Public Citizen Litigation Group‘s blog, Deepak Gupta compiles the amicus briefs filed in support of AT&T in AT&T v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Riley argues in the Wall Street Journal that “the case for affirmative action … has never been weaker. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
Finally, Justice Kennedy delivers an energetic summary of Montgomery v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
Carpenter relies on Riley v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am
Fortunately, the Chief Justice is well known for guiding the Court in a manner that respects the function of an Article III court, evidenced by the decision in the Michigan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 11:43 am
Roberts suggested that Dreeben’s argument was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Riley v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
Thus the Court has more recently applied the Fourth Amendment to cell phones(last year’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Coakley and Riley v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[5] In Bush v. [read post]
