Search for: "Riley v. Kennedy"
Results 101 - 120
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2008, 8:05 am
Details here. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
At 1 p.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Riley v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company (07-308) on whether a company that failed to meet the Tucker Act statute of limitations may seek a tax refund (with interest) directly under the Export Clause, and in Riley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 9:30 am
This preview is of a Voting Rights Act section 5 case to be argued on Monday. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 7:33 pm
Thomas Haymore, one the Stanford Law School students who did such great work on our brief, has written this summary of the case for ScotusWiki.... [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:32 am
In the third case on Monday, No. 07-77, Riley v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court case of Riley v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:07 am
The case, Riley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:51 pm
Amicus briefs have been filed supporting the Kennedy plaintiffs in Riley v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
In addition to the appellee’s brief in Riley v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
Here is the Respondents' Brief in the Riley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 11:53 am
Earlier today, Professors Pam Karlan and Jeff Fisher of the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic filed this brief on behalf of the appelless in Riley v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:05 am
The appellees' brief in Riley v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
Brown (06-939), Wednesday in Riley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 2:36 pm
Riley's position in Riley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:49 am
No. 07-77, Riley v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:52 pm
Bob Riley has filed his opening brief in Riley v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Kennedy (07-77), and Thursday in Republic of the Philippines v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
Pam Karlan will argue Riley v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:22 pm
The Supreme Court agreed to hear Governor Riley's appeal today in the case known in the Supreme Court as Riley v. [read post]