Search for: "Ring v. Arizona" Results 61 - 80 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm by CJLF Staff
Arizona declared Arizona's pure judge sentencing in capital cases unconstitutional and overruled a prior case upholding the Arizona capital sentencing procedure and held that a jury must find the existence of an aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt, but did not expressly overrule pre-Ring cases upholding Florida's mixed jury and judge capital sentencing, e.g., Hildwin v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 8:35 am by Jacek Stramski
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002); and (7) the death penalty is not proportionate in this case. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:45 am by Kent Scheidegger
  (For a brief summary of this early sentencing law, see Part I of our brief in Ring v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:21 am by Josh Blackman
S. ___, ___ (2020) (slip op., at 5) (discussing Ring v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 8:45 am
One of the other reasons the government offered for leaving the issue to percolate in lower courts is that the Court’s 2002 ruling in Ring v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  (UPDATE:  the Court did agree to hear the Arizona case.) [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  That attack is based on the Supreme Court's decision Ring v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:51 pm by Maddison Sullivan
Ginsburg also noted the Supreme Court found Arizona’s capital sentencing regime unconstitutional in Ring v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:41 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Arizona -like dimension as was raised in US v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:14 am by zshapiro
Notes:The practice of using a three judge panel to determine the existence of aggravating factors was terminated after the Supreme Court found in Ring v. [read post]