Search for: "Ring v. Arizona"
Results 61 - 80
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm
Ring is also an Apprendi case, and in Schriro v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 8:06 pm
The hapless tax-payers will continue funding the three-ring spectacle. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:35 am
New Jersey, and Ring v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
Arizona declared Arizona's pure judge sentencing in capital cases unconstitutional and overruled a prior case upholding the Arizona capital sentencing procedure and held that a jury must find the existence of an aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt, but did not expressly overrule pre-Ring cases upholding Florida's mixed jury and judge capital sentencing, e.g., Hildwin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:08 pm
Arizona. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Grimmelmann v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 8:35 am
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002); and (7) the death penalty is not proportionate in this case. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:58 am
Supreme Court decided the seminal capital case Ring v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:48 am
More on Ring v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:45 am
(For a brief summary of this early sentencing law, see Part I of our brief in Ring v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:47 pm
In this study, the Supreme Court decision Ring v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:21 am
S. ___, ___ (2020) (slip op., at 5) (discussing Ring v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 8:45 am
One of the other reasons the government offered for leaving the issue to percolate in lower courts is that the Court’s 2002 ruling in Ring v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:35 am
(UPDATE: the Court did agree to hear the Arizona case.) [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
That attack is based on the Supreme Court's decision Ring v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:51 pm
Ginsburg also noted the Supreme Court found Arizona’s capital sentencing regime unconstitutional in Ring v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
Irons v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
In Ring v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:41 pm
Arizona -like dimension as was raised in US v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:14 am
Notes:The practice of using a three judge panel to determine the existence of aggravating factors was terminated after the Supreme Court found in Ring v. [read post]
