Search for: "Ring v. Arizona" Results 101 - 120 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
” When my U.S. history class studied Miranda v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm by CJLF Staff
Arizona declared Arizona's pure judge sentencing in capital cases unconstitutional and overruled a prior case upholding the Arizona capital sentencing procedure and held that a jury must find the existence of an aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt, but did not expressly overrule pre-Ring cases upholding Florida's mixed jury and judge capital sentencing, e.g., Hildwin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:10 am by Laura DeGeer
" This court granted certiorari in light of its decision in Ring v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Arizona applies to Florida’s capital sentencing scheme, which requires a judge to impose a sentence after considering the jury’s (potentially non-unanimous) recommendation. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Arizona applies to Florida’s capital sentencing scheme, which requires a judge to impose a sentence after considering the jury’s (potentially non-unanimous) recommendation. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 8:35 am by Jacek Stramski
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002); and (7) the death penalty is not proportionate in this case. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:23 am by Jessica Smith
McKellar, 494 U.S. 407, 416 (1990) (same as to Arizona v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:17 am
In December 2011, he picked up three undocumented immigrants in the Arizona desert and helped transport them to a trailer house in Tucson, Arizona. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:22 pm by Maureen Johnston
Murdaugh 13-1057 Issue: Whether the court of appeals exceeded its authority to grant a writ of habeas corpus when it expanded Ring v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Murdaugh 13-1057Issue: Whether the court of appeals exceeded its authority to grant a writ of habeas corpus when it expanded Ring v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:05 am by Walter Olson
This has led him to support proposals for state RFRAs with broad definitions, like the one recently vetoed in Arizona, and also to file an amicus brief on behalf of employer Hobby Lobby in Sebelius v. [read post]