Search for: "Ring v. Arizona" Results 121 - 140 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2014, 8:23 am by Jessica Smith
McKellar, 494 U.S. 407, 416 (1990) (same as to Arizona v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:05 am by Walter Olson
This has led him to support proposals for state RFRAs with broad definitions, like the one recently vetoed in Arizona, and also to file an amicus brief on behalf of employer Hobby Lobby in Sebelius v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:06 am by CJLF Staff
  Orlando Sentinel journalist Gal Tziperman reports that the court's 5-2 opinion held that because the sentencing jury was unanimous in sentencing murderer Enoch Hall to death, his sentence did not violate the Supreme Court's Ring v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Arizona applies to Florida’s capital sentencing scheme, which requires a judge to impose a sentence after considering the jury’s (potentially non-unanimous) recommendation. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
Similar laws have been passed in Arizona and Kansas.None of them comport with the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:02 pm by Jon Sands
The jury instruction was thus proper under Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
Now, after Ring v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
  Howell also raises a Ring v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  677 (1995) Read the “Juror’s Handbook” at www.fija.org   Week 10:  Jurors and the Death Penalty Ring v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 10:21 am
ARIZONA, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), CONGRESS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY DELEGATED TO THE PRESIDENT THE POWER TO ENACT THE FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENT OF ELEMENTS OF CAPITAL MURDER, A PURELY LEGISLATIVE FUNCTIONCLAIM SEVENTEENTHE PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW IN THIS CASE WAS INSUFFICIENT AS A MATTER OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF THE FIFTH, SIXTH AND EIGHTH AMENDMENTSCLAIM EIGHTEENTHE MANNER IN WHICH THE GOVERNMENT WOULD CARRY OUT PETITIONER'S EXECUTION VIOLATES THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am by SOG Staff
  The Court determined that this procedure is unconstitutional in light of Ring v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am by SOG Staff
  The Court determined that this procedure is unconstitutional in light of Ring v. [read post]