Search for: "Rios v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 342, 246 Fed.Appx. 7 (2d Cir.2007) (same). [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 342, 246 Fed.Appx. 7 (2d Cir.2007) (same). [read post]
5 May 2012, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:25 pm
" They contacted United States authorities when the boat did not turn around but nothing happened. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm
For a couple of reasons, the presumption against extraterritoriality doesn’t apply neatly to ATS claims, as the Ninth and DC Circuits said in their 2011 decisions in Sarei v Rio Tinto and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
Although Rio Tinto has operations in many countries, including the United States, and Sarei lived in the United States as a resident alien when the complaint was filed, nothing done by Americans or in America, is at issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm
The Court’s order directs the parties to file supplemental briefs on whether the ATS “allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
Apparently, in reviewing the cert petition in Rio Tinto v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
In addition, there is a strong chance that the Court next Term could be reexamining its controversial ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:35 am
Rio Tinto case decided in October. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:10 pm
Rio Tinto case decided in October. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:17 am
The ATS provides that “district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
Rio Tinto in the Ninth Circuit, also raise the issue. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Max Mosley went to the European Court of Human Rights with his application against the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:51 pm
The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case U.S. v. [read post]
