Search for: "Rita v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:54 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
Such an extension, however, would accord such upward departures even greater protection than they had under the mandatory Guidelines.In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Rita v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:03 am
United States (combined preview here). [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 8:27 pm
United States and Claiborne v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 2:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:31 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Then came Booker (argued in the Supreme Court by TChris who writes at TalkLeft) in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 11:25 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Rita (Threlkel) Quinn v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 9:16 am
Another example this week comes from Judge Avern Cohn in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 8:25 pm
United States, 518 U.S. 81 (1996), to United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 1:12 pm
" Judge Berzon, dissenting, begins her opinion this way: "The majority's peculiar interpretation of the word 'reasonableness' not only defies its common usage in the English language, but more importantly, runs contrary to what this court decided, sitting en banc, in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
IFor publication opinions today (4): In United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 12:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
