Search for: "Rita v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Interestingly, given the amount of attention arbitration has gotten in recent years in state supreme courts around the country implementing the United States Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:47 am by Beth Graham
  In her article, Professor Mullenix discusses the far-reaching effect of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm by Don Cruse
ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER, CHARLES WESTBROOK, RICHEY OLIVER, CRAIG PORTER, SHARON WEBER, JUNE SMITH, RITA BAKER, STEPHANIE PEDDY, BILLIE RUTH HODGES, DALLAS CHRISTIAN, AND THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"we're ashamed that the president of the United States is from Texas." [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm by Kirk Jenkins
   Justice Rita Garman filed a lengthy dissent. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Beth Graham
  In her article, Professor Mullenix examines the upcoming United States Supreme Court decision in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Beth Graham
  The paper is a preview of the issues before the United States Supreme Court in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:01 am by Rory Little
United States), in which the Court will consider whether there an Apprendi right to jury trial for mandatory minimum sentencing facts. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:03 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Plaintiff Rogasciano Santiago allegedly entered the United States illegally in 1993, coming to Chicago. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by Rachel Price
United States http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf (23 January 2012) This judgment has been hailed by commentators as one of the most significant Fourth Amendment decisions of the decade. [read post]