Search for: "Rob Howse" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2008, 9:27 am
Next is a review essay by my law school mentor and Prawf Alum, Rob Howse, entitled, The End of the Globalization Debate. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 1:15 pm by Dan Rodriguez
  This is a peculiar venture, one that Rob Howse has skewered elsewhere on this blog, he focusing on the comparative aspects of the project. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:31 am by Simon Lester
I'm not sure whether any of the parties' submissions will be available in the Renewable Energy/Feed-In Tariff (DS412,426) appeal prior to the completion of the proceedings, but for those who are interested, here are two amicus submissions: -- from Professor Luca Rubini: http://www.worldtradelaw.net/amicus/RubiniCanada-RenewableEnergyAmicus.pdf -- from Mesa Power (advised by Appleton & Associates, Joanna Langille and Professor Rob Howse):… [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:19 am
I could've posted this as a trade law "brain-teaser", but see this interesting discussion paper, co-authored by Rob Howse, discussing the whole slew of WTO disciplines that may be relevant to production of and trade in biofuels. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm
Please welcome back Austen Parrish from Southwestern (international environmental); Rob Howse from NYU (international trade, legal theory); Eric E. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Simon Lester
Are the circumstances Rob describes (the size of the climate change problem) sufficient to satisfy Article XX? [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:34 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Jan Wouters & Dominic Coppens, An overview of the agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures – including a discussion of the agreement on agriculture Rob Howse, Do the world trade organization disciplines on domestic subsidies make sense? [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:23 am by Alan Alexandroff
With the benefit of Rob Howse's thoughtful reports throughout the AB hearing, we know that Division Member Chang was alert to the difference in the nature and application of Article 2.2 and GATT Article XX. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:24 pm
One of those reasons has been a paper I'm off to present, Taxing Punitive Damages, in Toronto at the Canadian Law and Econ Association this week/end and to celebrate the work of Michael Trebilcock, for whom (along with Rob Howse) I used to RA the summer before I started law school. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:42 pm by Dan Markel
  As I understand it, no school has as yet endured a coup by Paul Horwitz, Rob Howse, or myself (or Kevin Davis or Katrina Wyman). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 5:45 am by Simon Lester
 Last month, Roger Alford invited a few of us -- Lorand Bartels, Meredith Crowley, Piet Eeckhout, Jennifer Hillman, Rob Howse (via video), me, and Sophie Robin-Olivier -- to the Notre Dame campus in London to talk about it all. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:50 pm
But there are ILO standards that could serve as a proxy, as my colleague Rob Howse has noted in his scholarship. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
Leib, Rob Howse, Paul Horwitz, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Steve Vladeck and Orly Lobel.Last Updated: August 24, 2009 - Rank Today: 14http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/Patent Troll Tracker [feed]Tracks patent litigation.Last Updated: February 23, 2008 - Rank Today: 15http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/See alsoBlawg ranking by blawgsearch [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:46 pm by Simon Lester
Then Rob Howse suggested on Twitter that perhaps this deal would be an "interim agreement" under GATT Article XXIV. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:24 am by Jack Goldsmith
  However, as Rob Howse notes, the definition is limited at the beginning of Subsection (h)(1) to an agreement that “includes the United States, commits the United States to take action, or pursuant to which the United States commits or otherwise agrees to take action. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 7:37 am
Rob Howse says Corker-Cardin disclosure does not apply because it is limited to provisions that “commit the United States to take action. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 2:47 pm by Trachtman
  I would also note a point that Rob Howse has made:  Article XIX is a facility for national safeguards action:  unless a state purports to act under Article XIX, it is not relevant. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm by Simon Lester
Rob Howse: A very shrewd observation of the authors is that, in a number of doctrinal areas, the AB has chosen approaches that entail judicial balancing, or case-by-case weighing of multiple factors or considerations, to “bright lines.” [read post]