Search for: "Rob Natelson"
Results 21 - 40
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
” Rob Natelson’s extensive historical research finds that these statutes encompassed the times, places and mechanics of voting, registration lists, districting, qualifications of electors and candidates, prohibitions on misconduct at the polls, and the rules of decision (i.e. plurality or majority vote). [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Early on, for example, there was an August 17, 2009 blog post by Rob Natelson entitled “Obamacare’s Dubious Constitutionality,” which was followed shortly thereafter by a Washington Post op-ed by David Rivkin and Lee Casey entitled “Constitutionality of Health Care Insurance Mandate Questioned. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm
The brief is based on the research contained in the article The Origins and Meaning of ‘Vacancies that May Happen During the Recess’ in the Constitution’s Recess Appointments Clause, by my Independence Institute colleague Rob Natelson. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 10:30 am
And see here for a review of the book by constitutional law scholar Rob Natelson. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:55 pm
(David Kopel) My Independence Institute colleague Rob Natelson examines the question from an originalist perspective, in a new working paper published on SSRN. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 3:34 pm
Co-blogger David Bernstein has discussed the Due Process Clause; Ryan Williams has discussed the Citizenship Clause; Gary Lawson, Guy Seidman, and Rob Natelson have discussed the backdrops of fiduciary law. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 12:46 pm
That view is challenged in a new article by Gary Lawson (BU), Guy Seidman (Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, Israel) and Rob Natelson (Independence Institute). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am
Prakash extensively, and also perhaps because another scholar whom Justice Thomas relied on (Rob Natelson) cited me so much. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Much more extensive discussion of the direct/indirect tax issue (but not of window taxes) can be found in Rob Natelson’s 27 minute podcast on the subject, for iVoices.org. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:30 pm
Rob Natelson explains why in this 27 minute podcast from iVoices.org. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
The originalist, Marshallian understanding of the doctrine of incidental powers was the subject of the amicus brief which Rob Natelson, Gary Lawson, and I wrote. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm
(Incidentally, this may make me the second VC writer–very distantly second after Randy himself–to state in writing that the health control law is unconstitutional under modern law, not just under original meaning. ) My Independence Institute colleague Rob Natelson (U. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:30 am
(David Kopel) On behalf of the Independence Institute, Rob Natelson and I wrote an amicus brief on the Medicaid mandate currently before the Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 6:20 pm
Rob Natelson wrote an excellent article titled Is it a “tax” or not a “tax”? [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
(David Kopel) Rob Natelson explains it all in his latest blog post. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:32 pm
” The brief relies heavily on the scholarship of my Independence Institute colleague Rob Natelson, who happens to be the leading scholarly expert on the Guarantee clause.In short, the Founders defined a “republic” to include governments such as those of ancient Athens, Carthage, and Sparta, all of which included elements of direct democracy. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
(David Kopel) In this iVoices.org podcast, Rob Natelson explains why unilateral presidential creation of new debt is: 1. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:32 am
I wrote the foreword, Sandy Levinson wrote the afterword, and an all-star cast including Randy Barnett, Brannon Denning, Richard Epstein, Tim Lynch, Rob Natelson, and too many other luminaries to mention contributed the stuff in between. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:42 pm
Rob Natelson, a former law professor and now a constitutional scholar at the Independent Institute, wrote an article titled "The Greatly Misunderstood Chief Justice John Marshall". [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:17 pm
One of the better ones was by Rob Natelson, who wrote a response addressing some of the many illogical or inaccurate claims therein. [read post]
