Search for: "Rob Natelson"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 5:42 pm
My Independence Institute colleague Rob Natelson wrote a response addressing some of the many illogical or inaccurate claims therein.For example:Stengel: “The framers . . . gave us the idea that a black person was three-fifths of a human being, that women were not allowed to vote and that South Dakota should have the same number of Senators as California, which is kind of crazy. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm
(For more on Marshall’s views about federal health control, see this article by Rob Natelson and me.)Marshall’s opinion in Gibbon may be considered the outer boundary of any originalist interpretation of the interstate commerce power. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:29 am
Jonathan Adler, over at the Volokh Conspiracy, has a post up about the vindictive move of the University of Montana Law School faculty to deny Rob Natelson the courtesy of Professor Emeritus status. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Natelson comments here. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:06 am
I previously blogged (here, here, here, and here) about Montana Law Prof Rob Natelson, who successfully challenged his dean's refusal to allow him to teach Con Law. [read post]
8 May 2011, 5:35 pm
In an open letter to Congress and posts on two Tea Party websites (the Tenth Amendment Center and the Independence Institute) Rob Natelson outlines why H.R. 5 violates both the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
In an article in the National Law Journal, Rob Natelson and I argue that the Southeastern Underwriters should be over-ruled. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 10:58 am
ROB NATELSON: Practical Guidance On Amending The Constitution By Convention. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:58 pm
”In a forthcoming article in Engage (the journal of The Federalist Society’s practice groups), Rob Natelson and I penned a hypothetical opinion on a federal health control law, written entirely in Chief Justice Marshall’s voice. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:00 pm
Rob Natelson and I discuss the various issues. 25 minutes, MP3 from iVoices.org. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:58 am
ROB NATELSON: The 1787 Constitutional Convention Was Not a “Runaway Convention. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:22 pm
(David Kopel) So explains my Independence Institute colleague Rob Natelson, on his Our American Constitution blog. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:16 pm
As a law student, you would work directly for me or for Rob Natelson (retired U. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:39 pm
In a reply article for the Michigan Law Review’s on-line supplement, First Impressions, Rob Natelson and I challenge Balkin’s analysis. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm
Another law professor who has raised constitutional questions about Obamcare is Rob Natelson (U. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
The University of Montana’s Rob Natelson on the Executive Vesting Clause. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:29 pm
Rob Natelson (U. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 11:02 am
A recent blog post by University of Montana law professor (and Independence Institute Senior Fellow) Rob Natelson explains the issue for laymen: It's not an Equal Protection violation, because Equal Protection does not protect states from discrimination. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
Rob Natelson, makes four really good potential arguments for its unconstitutionality:1. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:08 pm
Independence Institute Senior Fellow (and University of Montana constitutional law professor) Rob Natelson suggests not, in this blog post. [read post]
