Search for: "Robert Chesney"
Results 61 - 80
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm
See BENJAMIN WITTES, ROBERT M. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 8:51 am
Or consider Robert Chesney’s recent post at Lawfare on what he shrewdly calls the “Pandora’s Box Critique of Drones,” a critique that encompasses the “arms race” and several other “look-what-the-US-has-unleashed” arguments that have many advocates at this moment. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 8:16 am
That’s an important acknowledgment, often overlooked, about the nature even of covert uses of force.Or consider Robert Chesney’s recent post at Lawfare on what he shrewdly calls the “Pandora’s Box Critique of Drones,” a critique that encompasses the “arms race” and several other “look-what-the-US-has-unleashed” arguments that have many advocates at this moment. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
The final point is, however, that the CIA is conducting these operations under the President’s direct order; someone has given serious thought to the diplomatic and other costs and benefits of the CIA versus the military conducting cross border raids.(4) News reports, as Robert Chesney has noted several times, make reference to different internal government legal authorities governing activities of the CIA and the uniformed military. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:59 pm
Robert M. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:31 am
As Robert Chesney notes at Lawfare, the US government does not appear to take a blanket position that a US citizen deemed to be a targetable participant in a terrorist group in an armed conflict has no due process rights outside of the US in any sense, on the one hand. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
As background academic reading on the issues in this case, see Robert Chesney’s forthcoming Yearbook of International Law article, available at SSRN in draft, “Who May Be Killed: Anwar al-Awlaki as a Case Study. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:21 pm
Nothing really novel here, but I talk about our dwindling arry of detention locations, the problems Congress causes by tying the president’s hands, AUMF renewal, and related matters: Responses to Questions for the Record Robert Chesney* Charles I. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:26 pm
(by Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney & Jack Goldsmith) One year ago today, Lawfare published its inaugural post, announcing a new web site devoted to “that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm
Today’s House Armed Services Hearing on “Ten Years After the 2001 AUMF: Current Status of Legal Authorities, Detention, and Prosecution in the War on Terror” included testimony from the following witnesses: Michael Mukasey Daniel Dell’Orto Steven Engel And, of course, Lawfare’s own Robert Chesney Here is video of the entire hearing: [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:41 pm
Robert Chesney (Lawfare) blogged about it first; his post is also much worth reading. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:15 am
UPDATE: Here is Professor Robert Chesney's Lawfareblog analysis of the opinion, in which he notes some shortcomings in the court's reasoning. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:47 pm
I’ve been meaning to blog on this, but meanwhile Robert Chesney poses the following question over at the Lawfare blog (where you can find links to these articles and an expanded discussion):[W]hat really struck me about the stories was their common reference to a particular legal argument. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:55 pm
I've been meaning to blog on this, following on Deborah's post below discussing the AP story, but meanwhile Robert Chesney poses the following question over at the Lawfare blog (where you can find links to these articles and an expanded discussion): [W]hat really struck me about the stories was their common reference to a particular legal argument. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:54 pm
Chesney, Who May Be Held? [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:39 am
Chesney, Who May Be Held? [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:35 pm
Chesney, Who May Be Held? [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:52 am
My proposal would be a far better solution, but we must not yield to such pressure.University of Texas law professor Robert Chesney makes the common mistake of treating all enactments, statutes, regulations, or administrative policies as "law". [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:45 am
The reporters hung their hats on a quote from University of Texas law professor Robert Chesney declaring that, "'It’s a bedrock principal of the Constitution that federal law is supreme over state law. [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:58 am
” Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, and Larkin Reynolds shed further light on these questions in their recent Brookings publication entitled The Emerging Law of Detention: The Guantanamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking 2.0. [read post]
