Search for: "Robert Litt"
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 7:47 am
The Second Edition of this top selling cybersecurity book is a must read for anyone working in the field including private practice attorneys and associates, in-house counsel, non-profit and government attorneys and others. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the National Security Law Podcast, featuring their analysis of Smith v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am
Robert Litt noted how public servants can help clarify public debates about surveillance. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:24 am
Robert Litt offered his thoughts on Timothy Edgar’s new book, “Beyond Snowden. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 4:09 am
This week, Robert Litt argued against the suggestion, citing concerns over limiting presidential power to direct enforcement priorities and the investigation of specific cases. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 1:23 pm
Andrew Kent responded to Robert Litt’s critique of his article regarding increasing the FBI director’s independence from the President through statutory for-cause limits on his removal. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
Robert Litt argued against an expansion of the FBI Director’s independence. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
I appreciate Robert Litt's response to my recent Lawfare piece, which raised the possibility of Congress giving the FBI independence from presidential control by means of statutory for-cause limits on removal of the director. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
Roberts).La protection conférée par le brevet cesse dès que la chose est vendue à un tiers, soit dès le transfert de propriété. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Robert Litt responded that regardless of the President’s actions, the underlying framework of the shield, and U.S. commitment, remains strong. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
Robert Litt counseled that the Privacy Shield authorizing the transfer of commercial data from Europe to the U.S. has not been compromised by actions taken by the Trump administration, contrary to concerns raised recently on this site by Cameron Kerry. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am
Robert Litt took issue with Coats’ and Rogers’ struggles to explain their refusal to answer senators’ questions about whether Trump had asked them to stop the Russia investigation, arguing that supportable response would have asserted that presidential communications privilege protected the contents of the conversations. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm
Robert Litt commented on DNI Coats’ and NSA Director Rogers’ struggles to explain why they would not answer when senators questioned them if Trump had asked them to prevent the Russian probe—and what a better answer might have been. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am
Dan Byman wrote about the importance of liaison relations with foreign intelligence partners, and former DNI General Counsel Robert Litt reviewed the statements made by H.R. [read post]
18 May 2017, 10:31 am
Robert Litt reviewed National Security Advisor H.R. [read post]
15 May 2017, 8:10 pm
This evening, we got former DNI General Counsel Robert Litt on the line for a discussion with Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes of the latest mess. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:06 am
It's here and it's only 10 pages long: Protecting the Fourth Amendment in the Information Age: A Response to Robert Litt In the article, I agree with a couple of Mr. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:22 am
In an exhaustive eighteen-page letter attached to the text of the Privacy Shield, Office of the Director of National Intelligence General Counsel Robert Litt made the case that U.S. signals intelligence collection is “as tailored as feasible and [that] signals intelligence collected in bulk can only be used for specific enumerated purposes. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
As DNI General Counsel Robert Litt noted recently in a related context, the Report "expresses the views of the Congress, and it therefore would ordinarily be followed as a matter of comity, but does not have the force of law. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:37 pm
Robert S. [read post]
