Search for: "Robert Loeb"
Results 41 - 60
of 164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
Robert Loeb is up first to defend Byrd, and the justices pepper him with questions and hypotheticals about the rental company’s authority over the car. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:03 am
Here's a link to Robert Loeb's piece at Lawfare (cited by Greenhouse) on the "presumption of regularity"--the basis... [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 5:32 am
Wittes shared the "Age of Flynnocence Edition" of Rational Security: To respond to the government’s arguments in the Supreme Court case on the Trump administration's revised travel ban, Robert Loeb argued that the presumption of regularity does not inhibit judicial review of the motivations behind the order. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:00 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Stewart Baker posted the Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring an interview with Jeanette Manfra, DHS’s Assistant Secretary for Cyber Security and Communications Robert Loeb argued that the presumption of regularity does not prevent judges from reviewing the motives behind President Trump’s travel ban. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:04 am
Robert Loeb and Michael Linhorst discussed the case on Lawfare. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 12:22 pm
Robert Loeb and Michael Linhorst discussed a lawsuit alleging that several Twitter users’ first Amendment rights were violated when they were blocked by @realDonaldTrump for expressing their political views. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:19 am
Klemash, EY, on Sunday, July 9, 2017 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, Climate change, Diversity, Engagement, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Proxy access, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Shareholder proposals, Stewardship, Sustainability Second Circuit Rejects Shaw‘s “Extreme Departure Test” Posted by Robert Loeb and Robert Stern, Orrick,… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
Posted by Robert Loeb and Robert Stern, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, on Monday, July 10, 2017 Editor's Note: Robert Loeb and Robert Stern are partners at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 4:07 am
Robert Loeb argued that the Court’s decision violates the requirements of the Torture Victim Prevention Act, which forces federal courts to hear claims of foreign, extrajudicial killing taken under the color of foreign law. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 1:29 pm
” Robert Loeb argued that the D.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
(Amanda Shanor (Take Care) and Robert Loeb (Lawfare) have posted analyses that are similar to the Knight Institute’s, though more detailed and worth reading.) [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 12:20 pm
Robert Loeb examined the First Amendment implications of Trump’s decisions to block particular Twitter users from viewing his presidential Twitter account. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:00 am
(See Robert O’Brien, The Stasi Report: The Report of the Committee of Reflection on the Application of the Principle of Secularity in the Republic (William Hein & Co. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 5:58 am
Bachelder, McCarter & English LLP, on Monday, April 10, 2017 Tags: Bonuses, Clawbacks, Earnouts, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Long-Term value, Management, Pay for performance, Stock options Dealmakers Expect a “Trump Bump” on M&A Posted by Steven Lipin, Brunswick Group LLP, on Monday, April 10, 2017 Tags: Antitrust, Cross-border transactions, Donald Trump, Mergers & acquisitions, Proxy fights, Securities regulation, Settlements,… [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am
Benjamin Wittes posted the “Guns, Butter and Palace Intrigue” edition of Rational Security: Robert Loeb argued that there was never a national security need for the travel ban, while Benjamin Wittes and Quinta Jurecic asked within the context of the judicial rulings on the travel ban what happens when the judiciary doesn’t trust the president’s oath of office. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
Robert Loeb argued that there was never a national security need for the travel ban. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm
It’s been a busy 24 hours in the increasingly fascinating relationship between President Trump and the federal judiciary. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
Robert Loeb and Emma Kohse examined the first invocation of the state secrets privilege by the DOJ in the Trump administration in Salim v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
Rugani, Robert Loeb, Robert Stern, Michael Tu, Kevin Askew, and William Foley. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
Prominent examples include William Ackman, Carl Icahn, Daniel Loeb, and Nelson Peltz. [read post]
