Search for: "Robert Natelson" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This short piece builds on my earlier response to Robert Natelson's purported "cite check" of my 2015 Yale Law Journal article by addressing some of the arguments in his new Federalist Society Review article. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:45 am
Professor Robert Natelson of the University of Montana has posted a 2007 article from the Ohio State Law Journal on "The Founders' Hermeneutic: The Real Original Understanding of Original Intent. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Gregory Ablavsky’s “Beyond the Indian Commerce Clause: Robert Natelson’s Problematic ‘Cite-Check’” is at the Stanford Law School blog, Legal Aggregate. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:27 am by Will Baude
Here's the abstract: Robert Natelson recently responded to a three-paragraph critique of his 2007 law review article that I offered in an amicus brief in the ongoing Brackeen litigation. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:59 pm by Will Baude
Here is an abstract: As part of an ongoing and often heated academic disagreement, Robert Natelson recently purported to "cite check" my 2015 Yale Law Journal article Beyond the Indian Commerce Clause. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here’s how Natelson describes Yates’s view (Natelson relies on an older strain of scholarship that attributed “Sydney” to Robert Yates, but newer scholarship attributes it to Abraham, Robert’s uncle; emphasis added). [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:32 am by Josh Blackman
Natelson's scholarship has been cited by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The abstract: This short piece builds on my earlier response to Robert Natelson’s purported “cite check” of my 2015 Yale Law Journal article by addressing some of the arguments in his new Federalist Society Review article. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
The first such article was Robert Natelson's, The Original Understanding of the Indian Commerce Clause, 85 Denver U.L. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Karen Tani
" The abstract:This short piece builds on my earlier response to Robert Natelson's purported "cite check" of my 2015 Yale Law Journal article by addressing some of the arguments in his new Federalist Society Review article. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:58 pm by Jon
My first candidates would be Randy Barnett Roger Pilon Janice Rogers Brown Alex Kozinski David Sentelle William Baude Larry Becraft Stephen Calabresi Elizabeth Price Foley Michaek Greve Kurt Lash Gary Larson Andrew Napolitano Robert Natelson Roger Roots Lawrence Solum These are taken from http://constitution.org/cs_peopl.htm , not including some who are social conservative or too old. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
[Another guest post from Professor Rob Natelson] [I am happy to post this follow-up essay from Professor Rob Natelson]. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
I am happy to pass on this guest post from Professor Robert Natelson, who co-authored an article on the war powers of the states. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:27 am by David Kopel
Much more extensive discussion of the direct/indirect tax issue (but not of window taxes) can be found in Rob Natelson’s 27 minute podcast on the subject, for iVoices.org. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am by Randy Barnett
Yet as time went on, people came to see a convention as more nefarious, forming misconceptions about what it might mean, according to new research by Robert Natelson, who recently left his post as a law professor at the University of Montana to join the Independence Institute. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by David Kopel
Natelson); Commerce in the Commerce Clause: A Response to Jack Balkin, 109 Michigan Law Review First Impressions 55 (2010) (with Natelson); and Health insurance is not ‘commerce’: A single erroneous Supreme Court precedent from 1944, South-Eastern Underwriters, should be overturned, National Law Journal, March 28, 2011 (with Natelson) (available on Lexix/Nexis).Since Scotusblog is trying to get people to comment on its own website, I’m not… [read post]