Search for: "Robert R. Lawless" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Reproductive rights advocates and activists breathed a collectively sigh of relief when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Or will it instead create a system of what I will call “legalistic lawlessness”? [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
(Chief Justice Roberts refused to read the question, so Paul simply did so outside the Senate chamber in front of TV cameras.)Paul and the Republicans might succeed in punishing that poor soul—and consider the extra dose of tragedy if Paul’s suspect is a Richard Jewell-like patsy, although it will be tragic even if it is not a case of mistaken identity—before the election, given how rabidly they are pursuing vengeance against him or her.Even if they do pull off that dirty… [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:11 am by Dale Carpenter
"  Legions of critics, including some our own Volokh Conspiracy brethren (for example, here  and here), essentially called it lawless. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In NFIB, Chief Justice Roberts noted that there was no consequence for failing to purchase qualifying health insurance other than the payment of a tax, and now that the tax has been eliminated, there is no consequence at all. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
There are 3 opinions that concur in part and dissent in part, one by Roberts, one by Breyer, and one by Sotomayor. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 349 (1974), requires a showing of “actual malice” before punitive damages are recovered, even in lawsuits brought by private figures. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 349 (1974), requires a showing of "actual malice" before punitive damages are recovered, even in lawsuits brought by private figures. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 11:30 am
(in Necessity and Proportionality in International Peace and Security Law, Claus Kress & Robert Lawless eds., forthcoming). [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:26 pm by Steve Shiffrin
In response, Chief Justice Roberts said we do not have Obama judges, or Trump judges, Bush judges, or Clinton judges. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The observation holds beyond criminal procedure and has persisted into the Roberts Court era. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am by Masahiro Kurosaki
Robert Lawless attempted to show that “[t]here is a strong argument such a strike would be lawful. [read post]