Search for: "Roberts, Board v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 3,176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Board of Education on the basis of "neutral principles. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Board of Education, the court famously overruled the doctrine of “separate but equal” that it had articulated in Plessy v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
It appears to us that Roberts assigned himself the Court's per curiam opinion in Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Use expressio unis to get at the fact that the noncommercial use holding is limited to situations where the challenged use is “used as a mark for a commercial product”; the term noncommercial use can reasonably include uses as a mark for political speech—Robert Kennedy, Jr., is using his father’s famous name to promote himself politically (also highlighting the importance of small differences when it comes to speech in the political realm). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The most obvious class of examples, as I discussed on Monday and as I explain at greater length in the article, consists of so-called "percentage" plans by which various states guarantee admission to a state university to students graduating in a specified top percentage of their respective high school classes.For example, in his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Union County Board of County Commissioners is hosting Gibbons v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am by John Elwood
Fairfax County School Board, 23-170Issue: Whether the Fairfax County School Board violated the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause when it overhauled the admissions criteria at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” [17] Boorstin brought Katz on board. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 2 February 2024, there was a trial on preliminary issues in the case of Jeffrey Hinds v British Boxing Board of Control Limited QB-2020-003448. [read post]