Search for: "Roberts v. Russell"
Results 1 - 20
of 731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2025, 8:17 am
Russell A. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:00 am
Although the Canon of 1603 initially secured a victory for ordinary bread over wafer bread in Anglican practice, wafers were reintroduced by the Victorian ritualists.[8] The question was litigated repeatedly, and wafers were famously declared illegal by the Purchas Judgment of 1871 – Elphinstone v Purchas (The Arches Court of Canterbury) [1871] UKPC – because they were not ‘the best and purest wheat bread’. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
Posted by Viral V. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
Posted by Viral V. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
Walker Matters To Consider for the 2025 Annual Meeting and Reporting Season: Executive Compensation Posted by Brian V. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
Walker Matters To Consider for the 2025 Annual Meeting and Reporting Season: Executive Compensation Posted by Brian V. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Subodh Mishra, ISS STOXX, on Monday, December 2, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Incentives, Russell 3000, S&P 500 Supermajority Requirement Inapplicable in the Context of a Reincorporation to Nevada Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, December 3, 2024 Tags: Delaware articles, Delaware Court of Chancery, Gunderson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Subodh Mishra, ISS STOXX, on Monday, December 2, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Incentives, Russell 3000, S&P 500 Supermajority Requirement Inapplicable in the Context of a Reincorporation to Nevada Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, December 3, 2024 Tags: Delaware articles, Delaware Court of Chancery, Gunderson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
"The Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d at 1046 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Drummond v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 98 AD3d 1116, 1117). [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
"The Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d at 1046 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Drummond v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 98 AD3d 1116, 1117). [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 12:00 pm
Hunt Ancram Fire Department Robert J. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 12:00 pm
Hunt Ancram Fire Department Robert J. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 5:49 am
Citing HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, Judge Lai denied Cheung’s applications because the court has no power to review the committee’s decision, which is binding on the court. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:00 am
At trial, Russell denied posting the records. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Reed and Russell M. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Reed and Russell M. [read post]