Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 9,773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
If Trump is removed from the ballot in Colorado, Roberts predicted that states would eventually attempt to knock other candidates off the ballot. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Taylor Gulatsi
In 1938, Congress established a nine-person Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise Committee with representatives from the United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Only Justice Roberts dissented. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ben Roberts-Smith’s 10-day appeal against a decision dismissing his defamation case over reports in The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald starts on 5 February 2024. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For instance, while the United States and Singapore determine the COMI based on the date of the application for recognition is filed, the United Kingdom and Australia use the date of the filing of the foreign proceedings and the date of the hearing of the recognition application, respectively, as the relevant dates to determine the debtor’s COMI. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
On January 2, 2024, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan issued an order to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]