Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 9,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
In the dilemma that he dare not remain in his home, or voluntarily leave the area, without incurring criminal penalties, and that the only way he could avoid punishment was to go to an Assembly Center and submit himself to military imprisonment, the petitioner did nothing. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:43 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States, the Supreme Court potentially adopted what has been... [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:40 pm by Ruthann Robson
Pflugerville Independent School District, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, Judge Robert Pittman, issued a temporary injunction against... [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:09 pm
Here is an excerpt from the Introduction: On May 1, 2006, the United States Supreme Court... [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 8:46 am
Robert Loblaw lists the Decision of the Day as League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 2:59 pm by Immigration Prof
The immigration law concept of unlawful presence has played a prominent role in the Supreme Court’s evaluation of Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 5:24 pm by Ruthann Robson
DeSantis, United States District Judge Robert Hinkle of the Northern District of Florida held that the Florida statute requiring payment of fines,... [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:07 am by Ruthann Robson
DeSantis by United States District Judge Robert Hinkle results in an detailed permanent injunction outlining how Florida must comply with the... [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:09 am
Watson Chair and Centennial Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma Law Center, on February 19, 2008,the United States Supreme Court accepted cert on Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]