Search for: "Roberts v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 9,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
In the dilemma that he dare not remain in his home, or voluntarily leave the area, without incurring criminal penalties, and that the only way he could avoid punishment was to go to an Assembly Center and submit himself to military imprisonment, the petitioner did nothing. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that, had the petitioner attempted to violate Proclamation No. 4 and leave the military area in which he lived, he would have been arrested and tried and convicted for violation of Proclamation No. 4. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
On March 2, 1942, the petitioner, therefore, had notice that, by Executive Order, the President, to prevent espionage and sabotage, had authorized the Military to exclude him from certain areas and to prevent his entering or leaving certain areas without permission. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:39 pm
On March 2, 1942, the petitioner, therefore, had notice that, by Executive Order, the President, to prevent espionage and sabotage, had authorized the Military to exclude him from certain areas and to prevent his entering or leaving certain areas without permission. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
In the dilemma that he dare not remain in his home, or voluntarily leave the area, without incurring criminal penalties, and that the only way he could avoid punishment was to go to an Assembly Center and submit himself to military imprisonment, the petitioner did nothing. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that, had the petitioner attempted to violate Proclamation No. 4 and leave the military area in which he lived, he would have been arrested and tried and convicted for violation of Proclamation No. 4. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm
We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that, had the petitioner attempted to violate Proclamation No. 4 and leave the military area in which he lived, he would have been arrested and tried and convicted for violation of Proclamation No. 4. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
In the dilemma that he dare not remain in his home, or voluntarily leave the area, without incurring criminal penalties, and that the only way he could avoid punishment was to go to an Assembly Center and submit himself to military imprisonment, the petitioner did nothing. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:39 pm
On March 2, 1942, the petitioner, therefore, had notice that, by Executive Order, the President, to prevent espionage and sabotage, had authorized the Military to exclude him from certain areas and to prevent his entering or leaving certain areas without permission. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Barr v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
First, does United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:06 am
Republicans v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:07 am
DeSantis by United States District Judge Robert Hinkle results in an detailed permanent injunction outlining how Florida must comply with the... [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:18 pm
McKinney School of Law) has posted United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 8:46 am
Robert Loblaw lists the Decision of the Day as League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:03 am
Several weeks ago, we wrote about the case of United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:40 pm
Pflugerville Independent School District, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, Judge Robert Pittman, issued a temporary injunction against... [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:09 pm
Here is an excerpt from the Introduction: On May 1, 2006, the United States Supreme Court... [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 2:59 pm
The immigration law concept of unlawful presence has played a prominent role in the Supreme Court’s evaluation of Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:00 pm
United States ... [read post]