Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 9,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 6:45 am by Jerry Votava
Roberts held that the government did not sufficiently prove the elements of the charges of seditious conspiracy, conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction and other weapons related charges in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
James Weinstein (Arizona State) and I filed an amicus brief last week in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:21 am
The United States Supreme Court has issues a 6-3 decision in Medellin v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:28 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In Citizens United, on the other hand, Roberts joined the majority in refusing to adopt a narrowing construction of the statute, and authored a concurring opinion stating that the Court should not adopt a narrow decision just because it is narrow, but that it “must also be right. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:21 am by Beth Graham
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:47 am by Matt Kaiser
United States, Elena Kagan, Guns, Guns / Firearms, HIV / AIDS, John G. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:38 pm by Gene Quinn
I have just received a copy of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s first Memorandum to the Patent Examining Corps regarding the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier today in Bilski v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 6:39 am
United States–the removal case–but that case is not cited anywhere in the government’s brief. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:35 pm
Brand (University of Pittsburgh - School of Law) has posted Treaties and the Separation of Powers in the United States: A Reassessment after Medellin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:58 am
United States, and Bloate v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:09 am by Employment Services
Certiorari was then granted to the congregation.After a review of the facts of the case and a lengthy review of the history of religious freedoms in both Britain and the United States, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: We agree that there is such a ministerial exception. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:31 pm by Karen Hoffmann
United States, finding that the government violated the human rights of Ms. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: In his essay, Joondeph states that “there is no benchmark for how often the Chamber of Commerce should prevail if the Roberts Court were ‘business neutral. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
United States as a big step towards repealing the exclusionary rule the Court crafted in 1961 in Mapp v. [read post]