Search for: "Roberts v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 9,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 2:05 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined Justice Ginsburg’s opinion. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 4:17 am
United States (see our summary here); we're waiting for a decision after oral argument in Koontz v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
See, e.g., Robert v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 8:10 am
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is known as the results test because it prohibits any state electoral regulation that “results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
With regard to the state’s reliance on Ward v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
Roberts states the doctrine in the one-line form that Chief Justice Rehnquist used in Nixon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:23 am
“Court,” “government,” “law,” “federal,” “United States” and “Congress” are all top-frequency words from Roberts’ Year End Reports. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
In Estate of McCall v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:32 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled today in Caperton v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am
As we have previously written, in 2004, the United States Supreme Court, in Crawford v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:30 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:01 am
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chautauqua Institution. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:01 pm
Earlier today the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a new memorandum to patent examiners on recent software patent eligibility decisions from the Federal Circuit. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
California and United States v. [read post]
