Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 9,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:Alarmed by recent headlines regarding the demise of organized labor in the United States, I turn to the founding of the republic to show that hostility to labor unions has a long history. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:26 am by Will Baude
[reflections from Robert Leider on the oral argument in Torres v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:05 am by Mary Zambreno
In a landmark decision issued by the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
I’d contrast my view, for example, with Toobin’s view of Chief Justice John Roberts in Citizens United. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:40 pm by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court dismissed as improvidently granted two cases: United States v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Roberts, Jr., and Justices Samuel A. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor and Kagan joined the majority opinion. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor and Kagan joined the majority opinion. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:10 am
Attorney Preet Bharara has filed a 53-page complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, United States of America v Carl Kruger, Richard Lipsky, Aaron Malinski, Solomon Kalish, Robert Aquino, David Rosen, William Boyland, Jr. and Michael Turano, alleging violations of 18 USC §§1341, 1343, 1346, 1349, and 1956(a)(1)(B) and (h).In a press release issued March 10, 2011, concerning the complaint, Governor… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
The bad news for the friends of federalism is that the 4-4 decision was likely the result of Chief Justice Roberts' recusal: It is difficult to believe that Roberts who joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in Gonzales v Oregon, would tolerate state tort claims rooted in the allegation that a manufacturer committed fraud against the FDA. [read post]