Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 9,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2014, 10:15 am by Robert Trautmann
United States Senator Robert Menendez – the senior senator from New Jersey, today issued a letter seeking a full investigation into the fraudulent altering of reports by carrier friendly experts. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
Roberts of the Solicitor General’s office will argue for the United States, and Peter B. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:15 pm
And Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:12 am
United States (08-192) . [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by David Kopel
” The statute would therefore outlaw the sale in the United States of a bullfighting video produced in Spain (since bullfighting is not legal in the United States), the sale of any hunting video or magazine in the District of Columbia (since no hunting is allowed in the District) or the sale of a crossbow hunting video or magazine in the many states which allow hunting with compound bows but not with crossbows. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas declined to certify a class under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
True law nerds know that we all get to kick off every new year with the annual end-of-year report from the Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
United States largely avoids the big constitutional issue that was the original focus of the case: the scope of the treaty power. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:51 pm by John Stigi
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, applying the reasoning in its own decision in Kiobel v. [read post]