Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 9,880
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
The legislation restricts wetlands that the state can regulate to those considered “waters of the United States,” and it specifies that wetlands do not include prior converted cropland. [read post]
You don’t want to have Black people or Latinos, or any other identifiable group shut out from opportunities to become United States senators or the president, for example. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am by Guest Author
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am by jonathanturley
In fairness to some of the less bombastic critics, the acceptance of the independent state legislature theory would have produced a radical change in how elections are handled in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm by Ilya Somin
Chief Justice Roberts' opinion notes that ordinarily the Supreme Court defers to state supreme courts as having the last word on questions involving the meaning of state law as was held in Murdock v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Updike Toler largely omits the historical context around the Constitutional Convention that other Indian Law scholars—notably Robert Clinton and Greg Ablavsky—have emphasized. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Mark Ashton
With a few exceptions the Supreme Courts of the United States both in Washington and 50 state capitals are courts of “limited jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am by Robert Liles
Texas Office of the Attorney General, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU): The MFCU is a specialized unit within the Texas Office of the Attorney General. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Amy Howe
In a decision by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court rejected the state’s invitation to narrow the scope of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]