Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 1001 - 1020 of 8,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2007, 10:15 am
Songying Fang, Tim Johnson, and Jason Roberts (all of the University of Minnesota Political Science Department) have posted "Will of the Minority: Rule of Four on the United States Supreme Court" on SSRN, see here. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by Gene Quinn
UPDATED: June 21, 2010 at 11:55 am Straight from the Broken Record department, the United States Supreme Court has again not issued a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 8:09 am
Below are some samples of their work: STOPPING THE OBSCENITY MADNESS 50 YEARS AFTER ROTH V. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 12:47 pm by NARF
Robert William Tix (Tribal Court Jurisdiction) United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:06 pm by Daniel Thies - Guest
The most striking feature of Tuesday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:03 am by Daniel Thies - Guest
The most striking feature of Tuesday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:32 pm by Kyle Green
After the October 6, 2014 argument in front of the United States Supreme Court, attorneys for Nicholas Heien and the attorneys for the state of North Carolina finally received a decision on December 15, 2014 for the Heien v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:42 am
Solicitor General Robert Bork in the Second Circuit to overturn racketeering and fraud convictions in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court invoked the Fourteenth Amendment in the landmark Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:23 pm
Roberts Jr., the chief justice of the United States, put a song lyric where the citation to precedent usually goes. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:02 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States triggered a vast regulatory expansion in Massachusetts v. [read post]