Search for: "Robin Effron" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 2:00 am by tortsprof
Robin Effron at Civ Pro Profs has the details. - SBS [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
In a recent paper posted to SSRN, Bigelow Teaching Fellow and Lecturer in Law Robin Effron focuses on the continuing problems facing the judge and litigants in these cases, and argues that many of those difficulties are a result of the Air Transportation Safety and Systems Stabilization Act which gave the Southern District of New York exclusive jurisdiction over all cases arising out of the events of September 11th, and created a cap on damages limiting recovery to the total amount… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Brian Leiter
(Thanks to Robin Effron for the pointer.) [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:42 pm by Joe Tort
Robin Effron (Brooklyn) over at Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog prints a fun quote from the NuvaRing litigation. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:41 am by Joe Tort
But really the reason for this post was the nerdy title. h/t Robin Effron at the Civil Procedure Blog. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Joe Tort
Here is what Robin Effron at the Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog has to say about it: The Fifth Circuit rejected the $21 million settlement of a class action over damage caused by the levee breaches on the grounds... [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 10:47 am
Jeremy Counseller and Rory Ryan of Baylor, is now being run by -Robin Effron (Event Jurisdiction and... [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 1:30 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Law professor Robin Effron claims she's using an open source approach to oputting together materials for her Civil Procedure class, but I noticed something odd in her description: The most important... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:00 am by propertyprof
Here's Robin Effron's take on the show: [W]hat I found interesting about the reporting was the political take. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:02 am by Paul Caron
Race, Reasonableness, and Considering Robin Effron (Brooklyn), Ex-Ante Discovery David Han (Pepperdine), Flexible Remedies in Speech-Tort... [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:22 pm by Dan Markel
Johnson (UND); Tom Baker (FIU); Jonah Gelbach (Yale); Stuart Buck (UArk); Robin Effron (Brooklyn); Jeff Lipshaw (Suffolk); and TJ Chiang (GMU). [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:36 am by Matthew J. Parlow
Professor Robin Effron of Brooklyn Law School and Professor Scott Bauries of the University of Kentucky College of Law each wrote responses (here and here) in the Florida Law Review Forum (the Florida Law Review’s online companion). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:30 am by Pamela Bookman
Robin Effron, Ousted: The New Dynamics of Privatized Procedure and Judicial Discretion, 98 B.U. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 8:34 am by Eric Carpenter
As these Prawfs posts by Robin Effron, Kerri Stone, and Bill Araiza show, there is a lot to cover. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:34 am by Dan Markel
And returning to the conversation are Kurt Lash (Illinois); Brian Galle (BC Law); and, for an extended visit about which she'll tell us in her posts, Robin Effron (Brooklyn LS). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:10 pm by Howard Wasserman
The following was posted by past guest Robin Effron (Brooklyn) at the Civ Pro & Fed Courts Blog, on a pilot program in the Northern District of Illinois requiring parties to engage in mandatory discovery requests and production (beyond FRCP 26(a) disclosure). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
For July, that means returning players Jeffrey Lipshaw (Suffolk) and Robin Effron (Brooklyn) and first-timers Leigh Osofsky (Miami), Catherine Smith (Denver, whose amicus on the constitutional rights of children was cited by the majority in Obergefell), and Heather Whitney (Bigelow Fellow, Chicago). [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:04 am by Anna Christensen
Discussing a recent poll (which Erin covered yesterday on this blog) on public perceptions of last month’s Citizens United decision, PrawfsBlawg’s Robin Effron notes in a post today that it is unclear whether Americans believe that the ruling is simply erroneous or instead disapprove of its implications for campaign finance.  [read post]