Search for: "Robinson v. Horn" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2020, 9:08 am
The Impact of Domestic Veto Players on Compliance with WTO Rulings Cale Horne, Kellan Robinson, & Megan Lloyd, The Relationship between Contributors’ Domestic Abuses and Peacekeeper Misconduct in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Arthur A Goldsmith, Out of Africa? [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:55 am by emagraken
Robinson (1993), 75 B.C.L.R. (2d) 273 (C.A.) at para. 11; Dechev v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
  (See further discussion in O Gay and H Tomlinson, ‘Privilege and Freedom of Speech’ in A Horne, G Drewry, and D Oliver, eds, Parliament and the Law (Hart Publishing, 2013), 56-57). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Beck, et al.
Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Georgia law); Robinson v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and… [read post]
1 Mar 2006, 2:33 pm by Frodnesor
The court did note, however, that under 11 U.S.C. 1322(b)(2), the debtor may still modify the term and interest rate of the loan.This latter point was discussed in greater detail in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801 (Bankr. [read post]
1 Mar 2006, 2:33 pm by Frodnesor
The court did note, however, that under 11 U.S.C. 1322(b)(2), the debtor may still modify the term and interest rate of the loan.This latter point was discussed in greater detail in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am by Frodnesor
Ala. 2/28/06), the court confirmed, like in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801, that the BAPCPA amendments do not abrogate Till v. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am by Frodnesor
Ala. 2/28/06), the court confirmed, like in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801, that the BAPCPA amendments do not abrogate Till v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]