Search for: "Robinson v. Robinson" Results 1 - 20 of 3,466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:03 am by Unreported Opinions
His mother passed away from her injuries, but Robinson survived and was charged with first degree murder and related […] The post ROY ROBINSON v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
 The Court of Appeals (Bianco, Robinson and Merriam) finds that the jury must resolve these factual disputes. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 12:38 pm by snahmod
Suppose §1983 Eighth Amendment actions are brought by non-prisoners such as the homeless who allege that they are punished either because of their status–see Robinson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by Patricia McKee
For instance, plaintiffs Richard Frederick Wheeler and Eleanor Geer Huddle sued on behalf of the Vilcabamba River in Ecuador in the case  Wheeler and Huddle v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Stephen Masterson
In a 6-3 decision, the Court rejected the petitioners’ claim that criminalizing sleeping outdoors is equivalent to criminalizing someone based on their status, which was barred under the Eighth Amendment by the 1962 decision Robinson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:45 am by Austin Sarat
”To reach this result, he offered a cramped reading of the 1962 Supreme Court decision in Robinson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Punishing people for their status is 'cruel and unusual' under the Eighth Amendment," she writes.The only precedent that potentially speaks to this issue is Robinson v. [read post]