Search for: "Robinson v. Waterman" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
The issue was whether PHM knew or had reason to believe that this was the case, specifically whether this was true of Mr Beatty, owner of LTEV, a shareholder in PHM and Managing Director of both companies.See no evil, here no evil, liable for no evilFBT referred the Court to Columbia Pictures Industries Inc v Robinson [1987] 1 Ch 38 where Scott J said that a person who deliberately refrains from inquiry and shuts their eyes to that which is obvious, cannot be heard to say that they… [read post]