Search for: "Rock v. Marks"
Results 1 - 20
of 738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2011, 8:51 am
In Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:48 am
It contracted with defendant in connection with the administration of its marks and prgrams. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
Taco Cabana, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
Taco Cabana, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:21 pm
Rock legend gets to continue lawsuit against HP for selling penis-measuring app named after him – Evans v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
It is reported that several years ago, the mark Pet Rock was registered as a trademark in the United States (unfortunately due to the power outage at the USPTO offices in suburban Washington DC, this Kat was unable to verify this information). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:24 pm
See Hard Rock Cafe International (USA), Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 11:50 am
In Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 4:42 am
Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:46 pm
But plaintiff uses its mark in connection with Christian rock. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
The rocks. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:38 pm
The case is Lee v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm
Mark Scarberry on a discussion list I’m on, and mentioned in some of the briefs in the Salazar v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:39 am
Bond v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 3:28 pm
KDAA v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:23 pm
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:23 pm
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:08 pm
Facebook TMs lots of LIKE marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Hells Angels pick fight with Amazon.com (over trademark infringement) Frustrated Trademark Attorney Examines Frustrated Marks Geekview IP Week in Review [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:21 pm
In the dismissed opposition, Petitioner alleged common law rights in the UROCK mark and THE UROCK NETWORK mark. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:21 pm
In the dismissed opposition, Petitioner alleged common law rights in the UROCK mark and THE UROCK NETWORK mark. [read post]
