Search for: "Rodgers v. Adams" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Sacco defendants failed to submit evidence establishing, prima facie, the absence of at least one essential element of the legal [*2]malpractice cause of action (see Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d at 545; Fricano v Law Offs. of Tisha Adams, LLC, 194 AD3d 1016, 1018; Ferrigno v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d 650, 652; Atiencia v Pinczewski, 148 AD3d 860, 861). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
First, in the case of R v Briggs-Price [2009] UKHL 19, Lord Rodger and Lord Neuberger both expressed doubts as to whether allegations of criminal conduct for the purposes of confiscation proceedings could be proved to the civil standard. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Miller, McIntyre in Context: A Very Personal Perspective Articles Adam N. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Religious imagery abounds, with Billy described as Adam before the fall and sacrificed, like Jesus Christ some say, for a greater good. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
On the second day of the Supreme Court’s new term, the justices heard arguments in Rutledge v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]