Search for: "Rodgers v. Rodgers" Results 61 - 80 of 315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2018, 12:02 pm by Dave
In John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock [2018] UKUT 249 (LC), Martin Rodger QC, Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal, made an interesting, tricky, but important distinction concerning the criteria for when a park provides security for a mobile home. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:29 am by Gregory Forman
Two years after the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:38 am
Criminal conviction and disqualification for public employmentRodgers v NYC Human Resources Administration, 546 NYS2d 581The Rogers case involved the termination of a public employee because he allegedly made false statements on his application for public employment. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:27 pm
Rodgers-da cruz(This article appears in The Dispute Resolver Blog from Division 1 of the American Bar Association Forum on the Construction Industry - ADR, Dispute Avoidance and Litigation. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Returning to Khuja, the majority took the view that A v BBC turned on very particular facts and did not represent a departure from the approach taken in Re S  and Re Guardian News and Media, which was endorsed in A v BBC [28]. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
The latter two are as creative as they are provocative.The Continuing Relevance of Billy BuddBilly Budd is relevant today because we—lawyers, judges, society—continue to wrestle with the difficult question whether to follow the literal text of the law when doing so may sacrifice justice in a specific case.During the confirmation hearings for then-Judge Neil Gorsuch for appointment to the Supreme Court, for example, much was made of his dissent in TransAm Trucking, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:56 pm by Liisa Speaker
 However, the Court of Appeals changed the direction again last year in Madson v Jaso (Docket No. 331605) and Ozimek v Rodgers (Docket No. 331726). [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
" Read on here.From the Faculty Lounge: coverage of an AALS panel on the legacy of Griswold v. [read post]